The impact of genetic variability in urate transporters on oxypurinol pharmacokinetics.

The genetic determinants of the allopurinol dose-concentration relationship have not been extensively studied. We aimed to clarify what factors, including genetic variation in urate transporters, influence oxypurinol pharmacokinetics (PKs). A population PK model for oxypurinol was developed with NONMEM (version 7.3). The influence of urate transporter genetic variants for ABCG2 (rs2231142 and rs10011796), SLC2A9/GLUT9 (rs11942223), SLC17A1/NPT1 (rs1183201), SLC22A12/URAT1 (rs3825018), SLC22A11/OAT4 (rs17300741), and ABCC4/MRP4 (rs4148500), as well as other participant factors on oxypurinol PKs was assessed. Data from 325 people with gout were available. The presence of the T allele for ABCG2 (rs2231142) and SLC17A1/NPT1 (rs1183201) was associated with a 24% and 22% increase in oxypurinol clearance, respectively, in univariate analysis. This effect was not significant in the multivariate analysis. In the final model, oxypurinol PKs were predicted by creatinine clearance, diuretic use, ethnicity, and body weight. We have found that genetic variability in the transporters examined does not appear to influence oxypurinol PKs.

An association study of ABCG2 rs2231142 on the concentrations of allopurinol and its metabolites.

ABCG2 is a gene that codes for the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). It is established that rs2231142 G>T, a single nucleotide polymorphism of the ABCG2 gene, is associated with gout and poor response to allopurinol, a uric acid-lowering agent used to treat this condition. It has also been suggested that oxypurinol, the primary active metabolite of allopurinol, is a substrate of the BCRP. We thus hypothesized that carrying the rs2231142 variant would be associated with decreased oxypurinol concentrations, which would explain the lower reduction in uric acid. We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between the ABCG2 rs2231142 variant and oxypurinol, allopurinol, and allopurinol riboside concentrations in 459 participants from the Montreal Heart Institute Hospital Cohort. Age, sex, weight, use of diuretics, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were all significantly associated with oxypurinol plasma concentration. No association was found between rs2231142 and oxypurinol, allopurinol and allopurinol riboside plasma concentrations. Rs2231142 was not significantly associated with daily allopurinol dose in the overall population, but an association was observed in men, with T carriers receiving higher doses. Our results do not support a major role of ABCG2 in the pharmacokinetics of allopurinol or its metabolites. The underlying mechanism of the association between rs2231142 and allopurinol efficacy requires further investigation.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling of Allopurinol, its Active Metabolite Oxypurinol, and Biomarkers Hypoxanthine, Xanthine and Uric Acid in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Neonates.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol, an xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor, is a promising intervention that may provide neuroprotection for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Currently, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALBINO, NCT03162653) is investigating the neuroprotective effect of allopurinol in HIE neonates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to establish the pharmacokinetics (PK) of allopurinol and oxypurinol, and the pharmacodynamics (PD) of both compounds on hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid in HIE neonates. The dosage used and the effect of allopurinol in this population, either or not undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH), were evaluated. METHODS: Forty-six neonates from the ALBINO study and two historical clinical studies were included. All doses were administered on the first day of life. In the ALBINO study (n = 20), neonates received a first dose of allopurinol 20 mg/kg, and, in the case of TH (n = 13), a second dose of allopurinol 10 mg/kg. In the historical cohorts (n = 26), neonates (all without TH) received two doses of allopurinol 20 mg/kg in total. Allopurinol and oxypurinol population PK, and their effects on inhibiting conversions of hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid, were assessed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: Allopurinol and oxypurinol PK were described by two sequential one-compartment models with an autoinhibition effect on allopurinol metabolism by oxypurinol. For allopurinol, clearance (CL) was 0.83 L/h (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.09) and volume of distribution (Vd) was 2.43 L (95% CI 2.25-2.63). For metabolite oxypurinol, CL and Vd relative to a formation fraction (fm) were 0.26 L/h (95% CI 0.23-0.3) and 11 L (95% CI 9.9-12.2), respectively. No difference in allopurinol and oxypurinol CL was found between TH and non-TH patients. The effect of allopurinol and oxypurinol on XO inhibition was described by a turnover model of hypoxanthine with sequential metabolites xanthine and uric acid. The combined allopurinol and oxypurinol concentration at the half-maximal XO inhibition was 0.36 mg/L (95% CI 0.31-0.42). CONCLUSION: The PK and PD of allopurinol, oxypurinol, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid in neonates with HIE were described. The dosing regimen applied in the ALBINO trial leads to the targeted XO inhibition in neonates treated with or without TH.

Oxypurinol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers: Influence of BCRP Q141K polymorphism and patient characteristics.

The missense variant, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) p.Q141K, which encodes a reduced function BCRP, has been linked to poor response to allopurinol. Using a multifaceted approach, we aimed to characterize the relationship(s) between BCRP p.Q141K, the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of oxypurinol (the active metabolite of allopurinol), and serum uric acid (SUA) levels. A prospective clinical study (NCT02956278) was conducted in which healthy volunteers were given a single oral dose of 300 mg allopurinol followed by intensive blood sampling. Data were analyzed using noncompartmental analysis and population PK/PD modeling. Additionally, electronic health records were analyzed to investigate whether clinical inhibitors of BCRP phenocopied the effects of the p.Q141K variant with respect to SUA. Subjects homozygous for p.Q141K had a longer half-life (34.2 ± 12.2 h vs. 19.1 ± 1.42 h) of oxypurinol. The PK/PD model showed that women had a 24.8% lower volume of distribution. Baseline SUA was affected by p.Q141K genotype and renal function; that is, it changed by 48.8% for every 1 mg/dl difference in serum creatinine. Real-world data analyses showed that patients prescribed clinical inhibitors of BCRP have higher SUA levels than those that have not been prescribed inhibitors of BCRP, consistent with the idea that BCRP inhibitors phenocopy the effects of p.Q141K on uric acid levels. This study identified important covariates of oxypurinol PK/PD that could affect its efficacy for the treatment of gout as well as a potential side effect of BCRP inhibitors on increasing uric acid levels, which has not been described previously.

Detection of allopurinol and oxypurinol in canine urine by HPLC/MS-MS: Focus on veterinary clinical pharmacokinetics.

Allopurinol is the most commonly used drug for the treatment of hyperuricemia in people, and in view of the risks of fatal hypersensitivity in patients with renal dysfunction, doses based on the glomerular filtration rate are proposed. In veterinary medicine, allopurinol is used in the treatment of canine leishmaniasis (CanL) caused by Leishmania infantum owing to the drug action of inhibiting the parasite's RNA synthesis. However, renal dysfunction frequently ensues from disease progression in dogs. The purpose of the present study was to standardize and validate a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) method to determine the concentration of allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypurinol in canine urine for clinical pharmacokinetic investigation. Urine samples of eleven (11) dogs with naturally occurring CanL and in the maintenance phase of the treatment with alopurinol were used. For the chromatographic analysis of urine, the mobile phase consisted of a solution of 0.1 % formic acid (88 %) in 10 mM ammonium acetate. Separation of allopurinol and oxypurinol occurred in a flow of 0.8 mL/min on a C8 reverse phase column 5 µm, and acyclovir was the internal standard. The HPLC-MS/MS method was validated by reaching the limits of detection and quantification, reproducibility and linearity. The lower limit of quantification achieved by the method was 10 µg/mL for both allopurinol and oxypurinol. Calibration curves were prepared in blank urine added with allopurinol at concentrations of 10-1000 µg/mL, and oxypurinol at 10-200 µg/mL. Coefficients of variation of less than 15 % between intracurrent and intercurrent accuracy values were observed for both allopurinol and oxypurinol. Urine test samples remained stable after being subjected to freeze-thaw cycles and remaining at room temperature for 4 h. The method proved to be adequate to quantify allopurinol and oxypurinol in urine samples from dogs under treatment.

The Effects of Special Patient Population Plasma on Pharmacokinetic Quantifications Using LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Clinical development of lesinurad, a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, required analysis of lesinurad in plasma from special patient populations. METHODS: EMA and FDA bioanalytical method validation guidance have recommended studying matrix effects on quantitation if samples from special patient populations are to be analyzed. In addition to lesinurad (plasma protein binding 98.2%), the matrix effects from special population plasma on the quantitation of verapamil (PPB 89.6%), allopurinol and oxypurinol (PPB negligible) were also investigated. RESULTS: The plasma from special population patients had no matrix effects on the three quantification methods with stable isotope labeled internal standard, protein precipitation extraction, and LC-MS/MS detection. The validated lesinurad plasma quantification method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic evaluations to support the clinical studies in renal impaired patients. CONCLUSION: Special population plasma did not affect quantitation of drugs with a wide range of plasma protein binding levels in human plasma. With the confirmation that there is no impact on quantification from the matrix, the bioanalytical method can be used to support the pharmacokinetic evaluations for clinical studies in special populations.

Ultra-performance hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry for simultaneous determination of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rat plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic study in rats.

A fixed dose combination of lesinurad and allopurinol has been recently approved by USFDA and EMA for treatment of gout-associated hyperuricemia in patients who have not achieved target serum uric acid levels with allopurinol alone. In this study, an ultra-performance hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (UPHILIC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rat plasma. Liquid liquid extraction using ethyl acetate as extracting agent was used for samples extraction procedure. Acquity UPLC HILIC column (100 mm x 2.1, 1.7µm) was used for separation of allopurinol, oxypurinol, lesinurad and internal standard (5-Florouracil). The mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile, water and formic acid (95:5:0.1, v/v/v), were eluted at 0.3 mL/min flow rate having total chromatographic run time of 3 min per sample. The analytes were detected on Acquity triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a Z-Spray electrospray ionization (ESI). The ESI source was operated in negative mode and multiple reaction monitoring was used for ion transition for all compounds. The precursor to product ion transition of m/z 134.94 > 64.07 for allopurinol, 150.89 > 41.91 for oxypurinol, 401.90 > 176.79 for lesinurad and 128.85 >41.92 for internal standard were used for identification and quantification. The calibration curves for all analytes were found to be linear with weighing factor of 1/x2 using regression analysis. The developed assay was successfully applied in an oral pharmacokinetic study of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rats.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Concomitant Multiple Dose Administration of Verinurad (RDEA3170) and Allopurinol in Adult Male Subjects With Gout.

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. This phase 1b, multiple-dose, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of verinurad in combination with allopurinol. Adult males with gout were randomized to receive once-daily oral doses of allopurinol 300 mg or verinurad 10 mg alone for 7 days, allopurinol 300 mg + verinurad 10 mg on days 8 to 14, and the alternative single agent on days 15 to 21. Colchicine 0.6 mg was taken prophylactically for gout flares. Plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad, allopurinol, oxypurinol (allopurinol active metabolite), colchicine (plasma only), and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Verinurad plasma exposure was unaffected by allopurinol. Verinurad increased the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) for allopurinol by 33%; the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was unaffected. Oxypurinol Cmax and AUC were reduced 32% and 38%, respectively, by verinurad. Colchicine plasma exposure was unaltered by verinurad. The maximum decrease in serum urate was greater with verinurad + allopurinol (65%) than with verinurad (51%) or allopurinol (43%) alone. Compared with the baseline rate, the maximum rate of uric acid excreted in urine was +56% with verinurad, -46% with allopurinol, and unchanged with verinurad + allopurinol. No serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were noted. Despite decreased systemic exposure of allopurinol and oxypurinol in the presence of verinurad, the combination resulted in greater serum urate reduction compared with either drug alone and was well tolerated at the studied doses.

Water soluble PEG-conjugate of xanthine oxidase inhibitor, PEG-AHPP micelles, as a novel therapeutic for ROS related inflammatory bowel diseases.

Xanthine oxidase (XO) is one of the major enzymes to generate superoxide anion (O2(-)), that is frequently associated with various diseases involving reactive oxygen species (ROS). 4-Amino-6-hydroxypyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (AHPP) is a potent XO inhibitor showing therapeutic potential for oxidative inflammatory diseases. However its very poor aqueous solubility makes pharmaceutical application difficult. To overcome this drawback, we have successfully synthesized a water soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugate of AHPP (PEG-AHPP) that exhibited good water solubility, forming micelles in aqueous solution. In the present study, the in vivo pharmacokinetics of this PEG-AHPP was examined. Further its therapeutic potential was investigated in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced mouse colitis model. Compared to parental AHPP, the plasma t1/2 of PEG-AHPP was increased remarkably from 3h to 14h, indicating macromolecular nature of AHPP in circulation. In the DSS induced colitis model, oral administration of 2% DSS in drinking water resulted in the progression of the colitis with diarrhea and hematochezia as well as shortening of the large bowel. Administration of PEG-AHPP intravenously (10mg/kg) or orally (20mg/kg) suppressed pathogenesis significantly; namely diarrhea was reduced markedly, and the length of large bowel returned to almost normal level. Pathological examination clearly revealed improvement of colonic ulcer or necrosis. Production of inflammatory cytokines, i.e., interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, was significantly increased in DSS-induced colitis mice. However, it was markedly suppressed by PEG-AHPP administration. Similar results were found when serum 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), that are the index of oxidative injury, were measured. PEG-AHPP thus may be a potential candidate drug for ROS-related diseases including inflammatory bowel disease.

Determination of allopurinol and oxypurinol in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Allopurinol is used widely for the treatment of gout, but its pharmacokinetics is complex and some patients show hypersensitivity, necessitating careful monitoring and improved detection methods. In this study, a sensitive and reliable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to determine the concentrations of allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypurinol in human plasma and urine using 2,6-dichloropurine as the internal standard (IS). Analytes and the IS were extracted from 0.5ml aliquots of plasma or urine using ethyl acetate and separated on an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 column using methanol and ammonium formate-formic acid buffer containing 5mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid (95:5, v/v) as the mobile phase (A) for allopurinol or methanol plus 5mM ammonium formate aqueous solution (95:5, v/v) as the mobile phase (B) for oxypurinol. Allopurinol was detected in positive ion mode and the analysis time was about 7min. The calibration curve was linear from 0.05 to 5µg/mL allopurinol in plasma and 0.5-30µg/mL in urine. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.05µg/mL in plasma and 0.5µg/mL in urine. The intra- and inter-day precision and relative errors of quality control (QC) samples were ≤11.1% for plasma and ≤ 8.7% for urine. Oxypurinol was detected in negative mode with an analysis time of about 4min. The calibration curve was linear from 0.05 to 5µg/mL in plasma (LLOQ, 0.05µg/mL) and from 1 to 50µg/mL in urine (LLOQ, 1µg/mL). The intra- and inter-day precision and relative errors were ≤7.0% for plasma and ≤9.6% for urine. This method was then successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of allopurinol and oxypurinol in humans.

The population pharmacokinetics of allopurinol and oxypurinol in patients with gout.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for allopurinol and oxypurinol and to explore the influence of patient characteristics on allopurinol and oxypurinol pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Data from 92 patients with gout and 12 healthy volunteers were available for analysis. A parent-metabolite model with a two-compartment model for allopurinol and a one-compartment model for oxypurinol was fitted to the data using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Renal function, fat-free mass (FFM) and diuretic use were found to predict differences in the pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol. The population estimates for allopurinol clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume were 50, 142 L/h/70 kg FFM, 11.4, 91 L/70 kg FFM, respectively, with a between-subject variability of 33 % (coefficient of variance, CV) for allopurinol clearance. Oxypurinol clearance and volume of distribution were estimated to be 0.78 L/h per 6 L/h creatinine clearance/70 kg FFM and 41 L/70 kg FFM in the final model, with a between-subject variability of 28 and 15 % (CV), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic model provides a means of predicting the allopurinol dose required to achieve target oxypurinol plasma concentrations for patients with different magnitudes of renal function, different body mass and with or without concomitant diuretic use. The model provides a basis for the rational dosing of allopurinol in clinical practice.

The pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol in people with gout.

AIMS: Our aim was to identify and quantify the sources of variability in oxypurinol pharmacokinetics and explore relationships with plasma urate concentrations. METHODS: Non-linear mixed effects modelling was applied to concentration-time data from 155 gouty patients with demographic, medical history and renal transporter genotype information. RESULTS: A one compartment pharmacokinetic model with first order absorption best described the oxypurinol concentration-time data. Renal function and concomitant medicines (diuretics and probenecid), but not transporter genotype, significantly influenced oxypurinol pharmacokinetics and reduced the between subject variability in the apparent clearance of oxypurinol (CL/F(m)) from 65% to 29%. CL/F(m) for patients with normal, mild, moderate and severe renal impairment was 1.8, 0.6, 0.3 and 0.18 l h(-1), respectively. Model predictions showed a relationship between plasma oxypurinol and urate concentrations and failure to reach target oxypurinol concentrations using suggested allopurinol dosing guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this first established pharmacokinetic model provides a tool to achieve target oxypurinol plasma concentrations, thereby optimizing the effectiveness and safety of allopurinol therapy in gouty patients with various degrees of renal impairment.

Lack of effect of hydrochlorothiazide and low-dose aspirin on the renal clearance of urate and oxypurinol after a single dose of allopurinol in normal volunteers.

AIMS: To determine whether low-dose aspirin and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) affect the renal clearance of oxypurinol and/or urate. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 8) were treated with allopurinol (600 mg, control), and allopurinol (600 mg) co-administered with single doses of aspirin (100 mg) or HCTZ (25 mg) or a combination of the two. RESULTS: Hydrochlorothiazide, low-dose aspirin or a combination of the two, when co-administered with allopurinol, did not significantly alter (P > 0.05) the renal clearance of oxypurinol or urate. In particular, aspirin and HCTZ, when taken together and with allopurinol, did not change (P > 0.05) oxypurinol fractional renal clearance (allopurinol alone: 0.217, 0.173-0.262; combined: 0.202, 0.155-0.250) or urate fractional renal clearance (allopurinol alone: 0.066, 0.032-0.099; combined: 0.058, 0.038-0.078). CONCLUSIONS: A single, low-dose of aspirin or an anti-hypertensive dose of hydrochlorothiazide, when administered alone or together with allopurinol, are unlikely to alter the hypouricaemic effect of allopurinol. The effect of chronic aspirin and HCTZ dosing taken together upon the efficacy of chronic allopurinol therapy in patients with hyperuricaemia needs to be investigated.

Studies on bi-layer osmotic pump tablets of water-insoluble allopurinol with large dose: in vitro and in vivo.

Controlled release bi-layer osmotic pump tablets (BOPT) of water-insoluble allopurinol with large dose (150 mg/BOPT) were successfully prepared merely with sodium chloride as osmotic promoting agent and polyethylene oxide (PEO) as suspending agent. Formulations of the two kinds of agents were investigated in order to discuss their effects on the release behavior of BOPT, and then the optimal formulation was evaluated. The pharmacokinetics studies of allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypurinol in two-preparation and two-period crossover design relative to the equivalent dose of commercially common allopurinol tablets were evaluated in six Beagle dogs. And the pharmacokinetics results showed that allopurinol BOPT were able to provide a slow release of allopurinol, and oxypurinol were bioequivalent between allopurinol BOPT and common allopurinol tablets. A good in vitro-in vivo correlation of allopurinol was also proved. In conclusion, water-insoluble drugs with large dose can be designed to BOPT for efficacy and safety use.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of allopurinol and oxypurinol.

Allopurinol is the drug most widely used to lower the blood concentrations of urate and, therefore, to decrease the number of repeated attacks of gout. Allopurinol is rapidly and extensively metabolised to oxypurinol (oxipurinol), and the hypouricaemic efficacy of allopurinol is due very largely to this metabolite. The pharmacokinetic parameters of allopurinol after oral dosage include oral bioavailability of 79 +/- 20% (mean +/- SD), an elimination half-life (t((1/2))) of 1.2 +/- 0.3 hours, apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of 15.8 +/- 5.2 mL/min/kg and an apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (V(d)/F) of 1.31 +/- 0.41 L/kg. Assuming that 90 mg of oxypurinol is formed from every 100mg of allopurinol, the pharmacokinetic parameters of oxypurinol in subjects with normal renal function are a t((1/2)) of 23.3 +/- 6.0 hours, CL/F of 0.31 +/- 0.07 mL/min/kg, V(d)/F of 0.59 +/- 0.16 L/kg, and renal clearance (CL(R)) relative to creatinine clearance of 0.19 +/- 0.06. Oxypurinol is cleared almost entirely by urinary excretion and, for many years, it has been recommended that the dosage of allopurinol should be reduced in renal impairment. A reduced initial target dosage in renal impairment is still reasonable, but recent data on the toxicity of allopurinol indicate that the dosage may be increased above the present guidelines if the reduction in plasma urate concentrations is inadequate. Measurement of plasma concentrations of oxypurinol in selected patients, particularly those with renal impairment, may help to decrease the risk of toxicity and improve the hypouricaemic response. Monitoring of plasma concentrations of oxypurinol should also help to identify patients with poor adherence. Uricosuric drugs, such as probenecid, have potentially opposing effects on the hypouricaemic efficacy of allopurinol. Their uricosuric effect lowers the plasma concentrations of urate; however, they increase the CL(R) of oxypurinol, thus potentially decreasing the influence of allopurinol. The net effect is an increased degree of hypouricaemia, but the interaction is probably limited to patients with normal renal function or only moderate impairment.

Involvement of uric acid transporter in increased renal clearance of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol induced by a uricosuric agent, benzbromarone.

Benzbromarone has been reported to increase the renal clearance of oxypurinol, an active metabolite of allopurinol. We examined the renal transport of oxypurinol to determine whether such a change in renal clearance could be explained by altered transporter-mediated reabsorption. Since the first step of reabsorption takes place at the renal epithelial apical membrane, we focused on membrane transporters. Benzbromarone is an inhibitor of reabsorption of uric acid mediated by the uric acid transporter (URAT) URAT1 (SLC22A12), which is expressed at the apical membrane of proximal tubular cells in humans. Uptake of oxypurinol by Xenopus oocytes injected with complementary RNA of URAT1 was significantly higher than that by water-injected oocytes, and the uptake was saturable, with a K(m) of about 800 microM. Moreover, benzbromarone inhibited the oxypurinol uptake by URAT1 at concentrations as low as 0.01 microM. The uptake of oxypurinol by another organic anion transporter (OAT), OAT4 (SLC22A11), which is also expressed at the apical membrane of proximal tubular epithelial cells, was negligible, whereas the uptake of [3H]estrone-3-sulfate by OAT4 was significantly inhibited by oxypurinol. Furthermore, neither the transport activity of organic cation/carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 nor OCTN2 was affected by oxypurinol or benzbromarone. These results indicate that URAT1 is involved in renal reabsorption of oxypurinol, and the increment of renal clearance of oxypurinol upon concomitant administration of benzbromarone could be due to drug interaction at URAT1.

Oxipurinol: alloxanthine, Oxyprim, oxypurinol.

Oxipurinol [alloxanthine, Oxyprim, oxypurinol] is the active metabolite of the only commercially available xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol. Oxipurinol is also a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. Oxipurinol is currently being developed by Cardiome Pharma. It is waiting for approval in the US for the treatment of allopurinol-intolerant hyperuricaemia (gout) and is in phase III trials for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Allopurinol is indicated for the treatment of symptomatic hyperuricaemia, or gout. Approximately 3-5% of patients receiving allopurinol develop intolerance to the drug. Oxipurinol was originally developed by Burroughs Wellcome (later GlaxoSmithKline), and has been available on a compassionate-use basis since 1967 for use in allopurinol-intolerant patients. The licensee company ILEX Oncology has stated that oxipurinol does not have patent protection. Oxipurinol's potential for treatment of congestive heart failure is based on the possibility that xanthine oxidase inhibitors may improve myocardial work efficiency by sensitising cardiac muscle cells to calcium ions, which are a key determinant of cardiac muscle function. This results in more efficient contraction of cardiac muscle cells, without the same increase in oxygen demand. At the second annual BioPartnering North America conference (BPN-2004) [February 2004, Vancouver, Canada], Cardiome Pharma stated that it was seeking a commercialisation partner to market and distribute oxipurinol in the US for the treatment of allopurinol-intolerant hyperuricaemia. In 1995, ILEX Oncology obtained an exclusive licence to oxipurinol from Burroughs Wellcome. Burroughs Wellcome later became part of Glaxo Wellcome, which merged with SmithKline Beecham in December 2000 to form GlaxoSmithKline. ILEX's licence agreement is now with GlaxoSmithKline and The Wellcome Foundation. In December 2001, ILEX granted Paralex, a privately held New York-based company, an exclusive sublicence to all of ILEX's rights to oxipurinol for the treatment of hyperuricaemia in allopurinol-intolerant patients. Paralex additionally gained the right to develop and commercialise oxipurinol in all fields, under data and technology owned by ILEX. Furthermore, Paralex had licensed certain intellectual property rights from The John Hopkins University relating to cardiovascular applications of xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Paralex was acquired by Cardiome Pharma in March 2002. Cardiome Pharma announced early in May 2002 that it had exercised its option to acquire from ILEX Oncology Inc. rights to clinical trial data for oxypurinol for the treatment of gout in allopurinol-intolerant patients. ILEX completed its open-label phase II clinical study of Oxyprim in allopurinol-intolerant gout patients, and the trial data were transferred to Cardiome. Cardiome stated in May 2002 that it intended to commence a further phase II trial of oxypurinol in gout. Phase III trials were in progress in 2003 in this indication. In 1995, ILEX Oncology continued the compassionate use distribution of oxipurinol while establishing a US FDA-approved registration plan for the agent. In November 1998, ILEX received Orphan Drug status for the use of oxipurinol in patients with symptomatic hyperuricaemia. ILEX Oncology's Development Pipeline for 1998 stated that oxipurinol had entered phase II clinical trials for the treatment of hyperuricaemia. In 2001, the clinical trials listing service CenterWatch stated that oxipurinol was in a phase II clinical trial with ILEX Oncology for the treatment of symptomatic hyperuricaemia in patients who are intolerant to allopurinol. The trial appeared to be taking place in the US, and was a multicentre, open-label, 14-week study in 90 patients. In February 2003, Cardiome confirmed beginning patient enrollment in three smaller phase II studies, with the first trial (EXOTIC) now completed. These three smaller proof-of-concept studies will observe surrogate endpoints such as cardiac output and exercise tolerance. The second proof-of-concept study in patients with CHF of ischemic aetiology (IV), known as EXOTIC-EF (Evaluation of XanThine Oxidase Inhibition on Cardiac Ejection Fraction), will assess the effects of oxypurinol on left ventricular performance. The EXOTIC-EF trial will start in the first quarter of 2004 and be completed by the second quarter of 2004. The third, LA PLATA, proof-of-concept study will explore the effects of 1 month of oral oxypurinol therapy on exercise capacity and left ventricular performance. It is projected that the LA PLATA study will start in the first quarter of 2004 and be completed by the third quarter of 2004. During the Heart Failure Society of America's meeting on 21 September 2003, Cardiome presented clinical data from its first proof-of-concept EXOTIC (European Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors Trial In Cardiac Disease) study. Cardiome intends to conduct a second trial, at the Eppendorf Clinic at the University of Hamburg, to determine the effect of oxypurinol on left ventricular performance in patients with CHF of ischaemic aetiology. This study will be an extension of the original proof-of-concept study. According to the 1st Annual BioPartnering conference held in Vancouver, Canada, in February 2003, Cardiome is seeking co-development partners for oxipurinol in the treatment of congestive heart failure. In July 2003, the US Patent and Trademark Office issued a new patent providing additional protection to Cardiome's programme focused on treatment of congestive heart failure with oxypurinol. The patent, No. 6,569,862, was the second issued to the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) in this field. The key claims in the new patent cover use of the entire family of drugs known as xanthine oxidase inhibitors applied to contractile disorders of the heart, including congestive heart failure. An earlier patent issued to JHU contained provisions relating to a specific mechanism of action and to specific forms of heart disease. Both patents and related intellectual property are licensed exclusively to Cardiome.

Facile and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of allopurinol and oxypurinol in human serum.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a rapid and sensitive assay for the simultaneous determination of allopurinol and oxypurinol in serum. METHOD: High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV-detection. Sample preparation consists of protein precipitation by an addition of trichloracetic acid. RESULTS: Percentage recovery and intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV%) for allopurinol were 97.4-101.3 and 0.66-5.13, respectively, in the concentration range 0.5-5.0 microg/mL. For oxypurinol, the percentage recovery and the intra-assay CV% were 93.2-98.1 and 0.88-5.62, respectively, in the concentration ranges 0.4-20 microg/mL. There was no interference of endogenous compounds in this assay. CONCLUSION: This method is useful for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of allopurinol in a clinical setting.

Bioequivalence of allopurinol and its metabolite oxipurinol in two tablet formulations.

OBJECTIVE: To test for the bioequivalence of two allopurinol 300 mg tablet formulations (generic allopurinol (Normon) and Zyloric tablets). METHOD: A single dose study was carried out in 24 healthy volunteers with a two-sequence, crossover block-randomized design. Blood samples were taken prior to each administration and at 19 points within 72 h after the dose. Plasma concentrations of allopurinol and oxypurinol were determined by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and Tmax were obtained directly from plasma allopurinol and oxypurinol concentrations. ke was estimated by log-linear regression and AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule for both allopurinol and oxypurinol. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC and Cmax were tested for equivalence after log-transformation of data. Differences of Tmax were evaluated by a non-parametric test. The 90% standard confidence intervals of the mean values for the test/reference ratios were for AUC and for Cmax, within the acceptable bioequivalence limits of 0.80-1.25 for both allopurinol and oxypurinol. CONCLUSION: The two formulations are bioequivalent and therefore interchangeable.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of allopurinol in elderly and young subjects.

AIMS: The prevalence of hyperuricaemia and gout increases with age as does the incidence of adverse effects to allopurinol, the major uric acid lowering drug. The present study was performed to compare the disposition and effects of allopurinol and its active metabolite oxipurinol in elderly and young subjects without major health problems. METHODS: Ten elderly (age range 71-93 years) and nine young subjects (24-35 years) received an oral dose of 200 mg allopurinol in an open, single dose, cross sectional design. Four of these individuals were additionally dosed with 200 mg allopurinol intravenously. Plasma and urine concentrations of allopurinol, oxipurinol, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid were measured by h. p.l.c. RESULTS: Total clearance of allopurinol was not different in elderly (15.7+/-3.8 ml min-1 kg-1, mean+/-s.e. mean) and young subjects (15.7+/-2.1), whereas total clearance of oxipurinol was significantly reduced in the aged (0.24+/-0.03) compared with young controls (0.37+/-0.05) as was the distribution volume of oxipurinol (0.60+/-0.09 and 0.84+/-0.07 l kg-1, respectively). Oxipurinol was eliminated primarily by the kidneys, allopurinol by metabolism. Fractional peroral bioavailability of allopurinol was 0.81+/-0.16 (n=4, two elderly and two young subjects). Although maximal plasma concentrations of oxipurinol were significantly higher in elderly (5. 63+/-0.83 microgram ml-1 ) than in young persons (3.75+/-0.25) as was the area under the oxipurinol plasma concentration-time curve, AUC (260+/-46 and 166+/-23 microgram ml-1 h, respectively), the pharmacodynamic effect of oxipurinol was smaller in elderly than young subjects (time-dependent decrease of plasma uric acid 83+/-30 microgram ml-1 h in elderly compared with 176+/-21 in young controls). Oxipurinol increased the renal clearance of xanthine, suggesting inhibition of tubular xanthine reabsorption by oxipurinol. CONCLUSIONS: Although allopurinol elimination is not reduced in the aged, that of its active metabolite oxipurinol is because of an age-dependent decline in renal function. Xanthine oxidase inhibition by oxipurinol appears to be reduced in old age. In addition to its uricostatic action, oxipurinol has a xanthinuric effect which is also diminished in the elderly.